
Paul Mahony

As the weather cools, we let the kitchen warm us. We’re roasting, we’re baking, we’re making pies and tarts and pizza. Yum!
Some of the best nutrition is to be found in wholegrains (and pseudograins) that have been around for thousands of years.
Wholefoods may just save your life, and at the very least, they will deliver a host of health benefits. Here’s what you need to know to get...
There is a link between the climate crisis and what’s on our plates. The hard facts are astounding, as is the difference a plant-based change...
There’s a serum for every skin condition, but which active ingredients do what? This is the guide to vegan and sustainably sourced serums...
The science is in. Shifting to a plant-based food system is essential to avoid climate and ecological breakdown. And now we have a roadmap to...
This tender, golden roast cauliflower with vibrant chimichurri sauce and crunchy macadamias makes a stunning addition to any seasonal spread....
This plant-based take on a classic is guaranteed to get your mouth watering.
This recipe from Tully’z Kitchen is your ticket to the ultimate authentic creamy vegan butter chicken curry – nutritious, flavoursome, and...
This vegan take on dauphinoise potatoes hits the spot every time, and is sure to impress as part of any spread.
Fresh, versatile, and nutritious, this simple tabbouleh by Claire Power is sure to become a regular in your repertoire. Traditionally made with...
Dainty sandwich fingers with the satisfying umami of vegan bacon and lashings of cream cheese make the perfect savoury inclusion in a classic...
Bowls of dips with crackers and veggie sticks make the perfect picnic spread to share with your friends.
Spraying sheets and pillows with calming scents can be a wonderful aid to slumber
The next time you go for a walk, discover the wonder of the everyday world around you
A skincare routine can be a way to nourish yourself inside and out
When the clouds converge, practise gratitude for the smallest of glimmers, and learn to dance in the rain.
The costs to our planet and the climate are becoming insurmountable. But we can’t solve a problem until we acknowledge it. Let’s get a few things straight.
Producing animal-based food products affects our planet in dramatic ways, and at what cost? Not only do we need to consider how effective and efficient they are in satisfying our nutritional requirements, but also their impacts on the environment and climate change.
In most aspects of economic activity, governments and corporations demand increasing levels of efficiency and productivity. However, they seem to have generally ignored the overall food production system in that regard. How else can we explain the continued large-scale production of animal-based foods when animals are a grossly and inherently inefficient source of nutrition. For example, it takes 20 kilograms of plant protein to produce just one kilogram of beef protein, and five kilograms of plant protein to produce one kilogram of pig or poultry protein. In fact, 77 percent of global soy production is used to feed farmed animals.
These huge levels of inefficiency mean we currently require far more resources, including land, to feed people than would be required if we were to adopt a non-animal diet. Even worse, the current system is not only inefficient but also ineffective to the extent that more than 700 million people globally are chronically undernourished. Based on a 2013 study from researchers at the University of Minnesota, a transition away from animal agriculture would give us the capacity to adequately feed these people many times over.
The scale of animal agriculture industries also exacerbates other problems to which it contributes, such as greenhouse gas emissions and resultant climate change.
77 percent of global soy production is used to feed farmed animals.
Humans and all members of the natural world now face an existential threat from climate change. Animal agriculture’s impacts are generally understated in official greenhouse gas reporting because relevant data is either classified under non-livestock headings, included on the basis of conservative calculations, or not included at all.
Classification under non-livestock headings – Land clearing for animal agriculture and other purposes is not allocated to the responsible sector. Rather, it has a stand-alone classification known as ‘land use, land use change, and forestry’. This arrangement reduces our ability to recognise and address the ongoing causes of climate change to the extent that they relate to our use of land.
Conservative reporting – A 100-year time horizon is generally used for calculating the global warming potential (GWP) of non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases. However methane – a major factor in animal agriculture’s climate change impacts – generally breaks down in the atmosphere to a significant extent in nine to 12 years. Therefore, a 100-year GWP (which shows the average impact over a period of 100 years) greatly understates its shorter-term impact. This is critical when considering the impact of near-term climate change tipping points, with potentially catastrophic and irreversible consequences.
Some meat industry participants argue erroneously that methane’s relatively short atmospheric lifetime means that a farming business can continue to emit the gas, provided its herd size is stable. However, methane’s shorter atmospheric lifetime is already allowed for in estimates of its GWP. What’s more, methane has accumulated in the atmosphere at a much higher rate than carbon dioxide since pre-industrial times, and it’s the atmospheric concentration of a greenhouse gas, rather than its emissions per se, that determines its warming impact. The meat industry also argues that biogenic (non-fossil) methane such as that emitted by cattle is less harmful than fossil methane. However, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the GWP multiplier of non-biogenic methane is close to that of the fossil variety.
Omissions from official greenhouse gas reporting – One key omission is the loss of carbon sequestration that arises from land clearing and other changes in land use. This failure has massive implications when we consider the land area used for animal agriculture. Allowing for loss of sequestration, a 2018 paper in the journal Nature found the global average greenhouse gas costs of dairy and beef to be three to four times higher than previous estimates from the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, which only used emissions from each year’s agricultural expansion. They also reported that the greenhouse gas emissions intensity of beef is 26 times that of pulses (including chickpeas and lentils) and 73 times that of soybeans.
Image: Sergio Souza on Pexels
We can only touch on the many costs of animal agriculture here, but water pollution, water usage, land degradation, invasive species, and biodiversity loss all need to be acknowledged.
Blue carbon – Consumption of fish and other sea animals has had a dramatic impact on kelp forests and vegetated coastal habitats, which have the ability to sequester and store large amounts of carbon. Vegetated coastal habitats, including seagrass meadows, mangroves, and salt marshes, are the most carbon-rich ecosystems in the world, capturing carbon 40 times faster than tropical rainforests. Kelp forests provide similar benefits. Such impacts are generally ignored in official greenhouse gas reporting.
Water pollution – Intensive dairying practices impact fresh water, including fertilisers and effluent entering the water system, resulting in excessive levels of nitrates. In rivers, these nitrates result in toxic algal blooms, which extract oxygen and make the water unsafe for fish and other inhabitants. Effluent also adds pathogens such as E. coli. In New Zealand, for example, 60 percent of rivers now have unacceptable levels of contamination, with the figure increasing to 95 to 99 percent in pastoral, urban, and non-native forested areas. The nitrates also enter groundwater systems that 50 percent of New Zealanders rely on for drinking water. Tragically, they are carcinogenic.
Land use – In dramatic contrast to the inefficiencies of animal agriculture, a 2019 paper in the journal Science reported that non-animal agriculture occupies a mere 17 percent of farmland globally while providing 63 percent of protein and 82 percent of calories. The report’s authors estimated that a general transition away from animals as a food source would reduce the area used as farmland globally by 76 percent (including 19 percent of arable land). This would release an area equal to Africa or four times that of Australia. That’s 31 million square kilometres that would be available for reforestation, afforestation, or rewilding!
Non-animal agriculture occupies a mere 17 percent of farmland globally.
Loss of biodiversity – Biodiversity loss and the resultant pressure on wild animals was highlighted by a 2018 paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which reported that the biomass of farmed animals (excluding farmed birds) is now 15 times that of wild animals. The biomass of farmed birds is more than double that of birds in the wild. Biodiversity is essential for the processes that support all life on Earth.
***
We need to recognise and acknowledge a problem before we can solve it. In the same way that entrenched economic interests continue to resist ending the use of fossil fuels, the animal agriculture sector resists a general transition away from its products. However, we will not overcome climate change and other threats without such a move. We must give our magnificent planet the opportunity to recover and thrive for the benefit of all its inhabitants – including us.
Lead image: Scharfsinn on Shutterstock
Bolster your mental health during the depths of winter by resisting the urge to hibernate indoors.
Going vegan can be a life-changing experience, and it’s not without its challenges. The good news is you’re not alone. There are identifiable...
If you haven’t quite got your cycle phases figured out, you’re not alone. But it’s time to tune in to your body’s rhythms - so that you...
Time for an eco spring clean? Here are seven simple swaps for the conscious consumer
Learn when to consider a vegan and gluten-free diet (and when you probably shouldn’t). Plus, discover four popular plant-based meals and how...
There is a link between the climate crisis and what’s on our plates. The hard facts are astounding, as is the difference a plant-based change...
In the fast-paced and demanding world we live in, finding moments of stillness and calm can be challenging. In an attempt to find a little peace...
The trick to this super-vibrant green curry is to add a bunch of blitzed leafy greens into the paste to ensure a lovely, bright-green colour. I...
This is the perfect plant-based brownie for the brownie connoisseur. Years in the making, and now captured for you to enjoy. It’s as much for...
Lusciously decadent but guilt free, these divine bars are definitive proof that there’s a healthier, plant-based version of anything you fancy....
Ramen is an all-time favourite Japanese dish, full of flavour and nutrition. The secret ingredient to our vegan eggs is black salt. Known as kala...
Smashed avocado on toast is perhaps the most popular breakfast or brunch item out there, and as much as we love the mighty avo, it generally has...
The star of the dish is the cashew cream. Be sure to push the veggies down so they are covered before baking. The magic happens when they soak up...
This Indonesian fried noodle dish can be found at both high-end restaurants and street food vendors in the region – it’s a popular dish for...
Spraying sheets and pillows with calming scents can be a wonderful aid to slumber
The next time you go for a walk, discover the wonder of the everyday world around you
A skincare routine can be a way to nourish yourself inside and out
When the clouds converge, practise gratitude for the smallest of glimmers, and learn to dance in the rain.